Prediction check

Verify Past

Your chart suggests moments that may have already happened. Tell us what matched — nothing here is a certainty, and every question is optional.

Why this page exists

A reading you can check

Most astrology spends itself on the part of your life nobody can check yet. Verify Past turns the chart the other way round and points it at the years you have already lived — the one stretch of the story where you, and nobody else, know what actually happened.

Every question on the right is an indication your own chart makes, placed in a real window of time. You say whether it landed. That single answer does two jobs at once: it grounds the Present and Future reading you are about to generate, and it records which classical patterns are actually holding — so the next reading, yours and everyone else’s, starts from evidence rather than from confidence.

How it works

Your chart speaks first
Classical rules are run against your chart and only the ones that fire for you appear. Each arrives carrying the Vimshottari dasha driving it and the window of years it points to. Nothing here is written for your sign — it is written for your chart.
You answer — or you don’t
Yes, Somewhat, or No. Every question is optional and skipping costs you nothing. Tender subjects are marked as such and phrased gently. A note is yours to add or leave blank, and is stored encrypted.
Your verified past adds up
The figure at the top of the tool is your own: clear Yes answers divided by the questions you answered. Skipped questions never count against it, and answering one again simply replaces your earlier verdict.
The reading unlocks
From your first confirmation onward, Present and Future can be generated — read through the mahadasha running now and the ones ahead, and opened from the events you confirmed rather than from a generic description of your sign.

Where your answers go

Your reading is built from your own events and nobody else’s. The note you write and the date you give are encrypted at rest, and the shared learning never reads either. That shared total sees five things and nothing more: which rule, which area of life, your verdict, your age at the time, and the mahadasha lord running then. Not your name, not your note, not the exact date.

This is a calibration signal, not scientific forecasting — and not medical, legal or financial advice. It measures one narrow thing: how often a classical indication matched events people reported about their own lives.

Questions people ask

What if almost nothing matches? ▾

That is a real result and worth knowing. The commonest cause is an inaccurate birth time: fifteen or twenty minutes can move your lagna into the next sign and take every house with it. If your time is a family recollection rather than a record, untick “birth time known” on the profile and read the house-based questions loosely — or have the time rectified by a Jyotishi before you judge the score.

Do I have to answer all of them? ▾

No. Quick read gives you a short, high-signal set instead of the full list, and any question at all can be skipped without touching your match. You can come back and answer more whenever you like.

What exactly does “Somewhat” mean? ▾

Use it when the theme was right but the shape or the timing was off. In the shared learning it counts as half a confirmation. In your own match figure only a clear Yes counts, so Somewhat lowers the percentage while still recording that the pattern was not simply wrong.

Can I change an answer later? ▾

Yes. One verdict is kept per question per chart, so answering again replaces the earlier one and the match recalculates. Memory opens up as you sit with a question — changing your mind is expected here, not a problem.

Why does it ask about painful things? ▾

Because the classical texts speak to them: a loss, strain in a marriage, distance from a parent. Leaving those out would make the check dishonest — it would only ever test the easy half. They are marked sensitive, put as a question and never as a statement, and are the easiest of all to skip.

Is this scientific? ▾

No, and we will not dress it up as such. What the numbers measure is narrow and honest: how often a classical indication matched events people reported about their own lives. That is a calibration signal — not evidence, not forecasting, and not a substitute for professional advice.

How many answers before it means anything? ▾

Your own reading sharpens from the very first confirmation, because it is grounded in your events alone. The shared confidence for a rule is a slower thing: until five answers have come in across everyone who has used it, that rule stays labelled insufficient no matter how well it has done so far.

Who can see my answers? ▾

You. They are tied to your account and your chart, and your Present and Future reading is built from your events only. What leaves your account is anonymous and countable: a rule, an area, a verdict, an age, a dasha lord.

Why this works better

A reading you are allowed to fail
No is a real answer here — kept, counted and shown. A prediction that cannot be wrong tells you nothing at all. These can be wrong, and when they are, that is what gets written down.
Timing, instead of vagueness
Each indication carries a named dasha and a dated window with your age inside it. “A change in your career, someday” cannot be checked by anyone. “This window, under this dasha” can be, by you, in about ten seconds.
Confidence is earned, never claimed
A rule’s confidence is pulled back toward a coin flip until real answers outweigh the doubt, so one lucky hit reads around sixty per cent and never a hundred. Below five answers a rule is labelled insufficient rather than handed a number that would look authoritative.
Weak patterns sink — they do not vanish
Rules that keep failing fall down the order and are flagged low; none is ever quietly deleted. You get shown what is not working, not only what is. A system that hides its misses is just a compliment.

Verify Past

Add a birth profile

A reading you are allowed to fail

Timing, instead of vagueness

Confidence is earned, never claimed

Weak patterns sink — they do not vanish